![]() |
B
arry's
T
ire
T
ech This is a series of articles on the technical aspects of tires, their care and usage. My primary purpose in these articles is to help people understand tires and thereby reduce the risks we all face every day. ..........and since tires is just about the only thing I know about.......... Please drop me a note if you have a topic you want to see: Barry@BarrysTireTech.com |
Winter and All Weather Tires: What you should get from this page:
Please Note: I am not going to talk about studded tires. I have very little experience with studded tires. But here's a link to a Wikipedia artucle on snow tires that has information about studded tires and where/when they can be used: Wikipedia: Snow Tires I am also not going to talk about tread depth vs snow traction and ice traction. I am trying to find some suitable graphs that show that snow traction decreases as a tire wears. Same for ice traction. When I do, I'll include them on this page. Until then, most sources claim that 5/32nds of an inch (4mm) is when winter tires should be removed and I see no reason to amend that. I've seen a couple of places where 7/32nds (5.5mm) is recommended - among these is Transport Canada. I haven't seen any place that comments on tread depth and ice traction. Obviously smooth is bad, but one would think that snow traction gets bad sooner than ice traction. I hope to find data to support that. |
To the right is the 3PMSF (3 Peak Mountain - Snow Flake) symbol, also known as the Alpine (pronounced al-peene) symbol. EVERY Winter tire has to have this symbol. It means the tire has passed a certain snow traction test (ASTM F1805). In the US and Canada, the value is 12% better than the new SRTT (Standard Reference Test Tire) - it used to be 10% for the old SRTT - and in EU member countries, the value is 25% better. If the tire doesn't have this symbol, it can't be considered a "Winter" tire. Please note: I am going to use the term "Alpine Symbol" from this point forward. I think it is easier to use than 3PMSF. The difference in the acceptance values is going to lead to confusion as it would be possible to sell Alpine symboled tires from Europe in the US and Canada, but not the other way around. I suppose this could lead to the industry choosing to adopt the 25% value worldwide, then changing the requirement in the US and Canada, but that sort of thing almost never happens as there is always someone who will try to take advantage of the situation. |
![]() |
The Test: ASTM F1805 ASTM = American Society for Testing and Materials (Now called ASTM International). This organization publishes tests and test standards for many industries, including the automotive (and therefore tire) industry. The test is an acceleration test conducted on a prepped snow surface. Yes, the snow is prepared! And there are specs the prepped snow has to have! That is why it took so long to develop a snow traction test. The test measures the peak traction during acceleration. I assume they did not chose a braking test because the snow might pile up in front of the tires and affect the results. Note: The truck to the right is an old instrumented truck where the right rear position is instrumented. Crude, but effective! |
![]() |
There is no ice traction standard to get the Alpine symbol. That's because, at the time, there wasn't a good way to test on ice. That has since changed. |
![]() |
![]() |
To the left is the "Ice Grip Symbol" that was created by the May, 2021 revision to the EU regulations on tires. I've heard it called the "Nordic Symbol", but that doesn't seem to be common usage. (Yet!!) Much like the Alpine symbol, this symbol requires passing a test, which consists of braking on a smooth ice surface, indoor or outdoor, and the results are compared to the SRTT. (Have you noticed how often the SRTT appears in tire testing?) The test is ISO19447. HOWEVER, at the writing of this page (May, 2022), the exact requirements haven't been published. When they are, I'll update this page. It is my understanding that tires that do well on this test do not do well in the wet traction part of the EU regulation, so it is intended that tires with this symbol are only suitable for Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, etc.). I can not help thinking there are other places where tires of this sort might also be useful (I'm looking at you, Canada!), but I have not heard of any movement in those locales. |
ALSO: Winter tires will NOT have UTQG ratings. They are exempt! So no treadwear ratings, nor traction ratings (except for the EU ratings). All Weather tires are not exempt since they are basically enhanced All Season tires |
![]() |
The Science:
Snow traction is mostly about edges - and that means lots of sipes (Paddle wheel effect). Notice all the sipes in the photo to the left. If you remove those sipes (and the studs!), you get an all season pattern! Tread compond? Has to be soft at winter temperatures - which means it is too soft for summer. That means that winter tires are NOT suitable for summer usage. I do not subscribe to the hydrophobic/hydrophilac (water attracting) theory of tread compounding. I think that is mostly marketing hype. Rubber is a hydrocarbon and so is oil - and we all know about oil and water. |
What about All Weather tires? They would be compounded for higher temperatures, which goes back to edges! All Terrain tires? They pass the test just due to their tread pattern. |
![]() |
At the time, snow traction testing was in its infancy - not reliable and not repeatable. So the RMA (Now the US Tire Manufactuers Association) created a verbal description of what an All Season tire was and allowed tire manufacturers to use the letters "M" and "S" with some sort of divider between those letters, such as "-" , "/", "+", etc. You can see that today on all All Season tires. Here's a link to the verbal description of what is required to get the "MS" symbol: USTMA Snow Tire Definitions for Passenger and Light Truck Tires What I find interesting is that in spite of the shortcomings of the "MS" symbol, snow tires basically disappeared from the market for about 20 years (except for a few locales). Over the years, consumer's expectations for snow traction has grown - as well as the tire manufacturers ability to deliver better snow traction. Needless to say, the "MS" designation just doesn't work anymore. |
![]() |
HOWEVER, time has proven that this is also to be inadequate. Not only are too many non-winter tires able to pass the test - much to the chagrin of the Canadian government - but tire manufactuers have improved snow traction even for winter tires. An attempt was made to expand the Alpine symbol to including a rating system for both snow and ice traction, but what is needed for ice traction is quite different than snow traction, so it was abandoned. |
![]() |
|